MotivAction Academy
Neuroscience-based leadership training that restores human connection and resilience for high-stress professionals nationwide.
More info here.

By: Tom Brown - Former Head and Asst. College Basketball Coach | Founder, One Heartbeat | Co-Founder, The Be Grundy Foundation

College basketball recruiting feels different right now.
Less predictable.
More competitive.

The transfer portal changed roster construction. Scholarships shifted.
Coaches now evaluate high school seniors alongside 21- and 22-year-olds
who have already proven they can produce in college.
High school recruiting still happens.
But the math changed.

Blake's Story
My oldest stepson, Blake, was a good high school player.
Tough. Competitive. Respected.
But he wasn't ranked. He wasn't nationally visible. He wasn't heavily
recruited.
I made calls just to help him secure a Division III opportunity.
As a freshman, he played nine total minutes.
Nine.

In today's world, many players in that situation transfer or quit.
He didn't.
He committed to the weight room.
He committed to development.
He got stronger.
He matured.
By his junior year, he was All-Conference.
By his senior year, he was Conference Player of the Year.

For his fifth year, he transferred - and could have pursued Division I
opportunities - but instead chose to follow his coach to a quality
Division II program.

His fifth-year team started five fifth-year players. Grown men.
That's the part most people underestimate.

An 18-year-old freshman competing against a 22-year-old is playing a
completely different game than most people realize.

College Teams Are Trying to Get Older
When coaches say they are trying to "get older," here's what that actually means.

They prefer players who are:

• 21 or 22 instead of 18
• Physically stronger
• Emotionally more mature
• Already proven against college competition
• Established in the classroom

An 18-year-old freshman is often still growing into his body.

A 22-year-old has:

• Been in a college weight program for three or four years
• Practiced against older players every day
• Experienced college travel and scouting
• Played through physical league competition
• Handled real adversity

That gap matters.

In today's system, coaches often have a choice:
Project what an 18-year-old might become or
Take a 22-year-old who has already produced in college games.
That's what "getting older" means.
It's not about age alone. It's about reducing risk. The more they reduce
risk the longer they get to keep their jobs.
There's another layer.

If a coach recruits and develops a freshman who performs well, there is
now a strong chance that player transfers up after a good season. That
possibility changes how some staffs think about investing in long-term
projection.
The result?
Fewer developmental risks.
More proven players.
And fewer high school scholarships in many programs.

Reality Check:
College basketball teams are aging - and prioritizing proven production
over long-term projection.

Exposure Doesn't Create a Prospect
Families spend thousands of dollars chasing exposure:
AAU circuits.
Elite camps.
Showcase events.
Recruiting platforms.

Exposure has value. But it doesn't create a recruiting level.
It reveals it.
If a player has the size, length, and physical tools that project to a level,
coaches usually find him.
If he doesn't yet project physically, being seen more often won't
manufacture it.
The biggest difference between high school and college basketball isn't
handling or creativity.
It's strength.

Bottom Line:
Development - especially physical development in the weight room - moves the needle far more than another showcase weekend.

High School Numbers Don't Translate Cleanly
People love stats.
Points per game.
Rebounds.
Awards.
But high school stats are apples to oranges.
Different competition.
Different roles.

College coaches aren't asking, "How many did he score?"
They're asking:

• Does this skill translate?
• Does this body hold up?
• Who can he guard?

Reality Check:
High school statistics matter far less in recruiting rooms than most
families realize.

Recruiting Isn't Fair - But It Isn't Random
Recruiting is not a reward system.
It's roster construction.
Coaches recruit based on:

• Positional need
• Budget realities
• Roster balance
• Physical profile
• Risk tolerance in a transfer-heavy system

Good players get overlooked.
Coaches also miss.
Just like players miss shots.

Bottom Line:
Recruiting isn't justice. It's math and fit.

For Most Players, the Window Is Later Than You Think
Elite prospects are recruited early.
Most players aren't.
For the majority of high school athletes, the most important years are the
growth years, especially before the junior year.
Strength.
Skill refinement.
Maturity.
Consistency.
Panic doesn't help.
More camps don't accelerate development.
Growth does.

The Intangibles Travel
Height, length, and body type matter.
But there are things players completely control:

• Body language
• Effort
• Competitive pride
• Coachability
• Defensive mindset
• Response to mistakes

Those traits earn trust.
Trust earns opportunity.
And opportunity compounds.

The Label Trap - And Ego
One of the most predictable mistakes in recruiting is chasing the highest label available:
Division I.
Power 5.
Mid-major.

Those words carry identity.
For high school boys especially, the level becomes part of how they see
themselves - and how they believe others see them.
Walking away from a label can feel like stepping backward.
Even when it isn't.
Fit and level are not the same thing.
The real question isn't:
"What looks best on signing day?"
The real question is:
"Where is there a path?"
Because signing day isn't the destination.
It's the starting line.

Bottom Line:
The right environment beats the loudest environment.

Final Thought
Recruiting can easily steal joy from a player's high school experience.
But those high school years -
those teammates,
those locker rooms,
those Friday nights -
You don't get them back.
The landscape changed.
The math changed.
The structure changed.
Growth still matters.
Fit still matters.
Strength still matters.
Character still matters.
And clarity beats panic every time.
Build the body. Build the habits. Let the right level find you!

If you'd like an experienced perspective on where your son fits in today's landscape, I'm available for consultation conversations with families navigating the process.

Tommy Brown
423.284.4614
Founder, One Heartbeat
tbrown@oneheartbeatwarriors.com

About the Author

Tommy Brown spent more than two decades in college basketball as a head coach and assistant coach, working at multiple levels of the game, including Division I, Division II, NAIA, and junior college. He coached in the Big Ten and the Big South.

As a head coach, he led his program to 13 straight 20-win seasons and was named National Coach of the Year during his tenure.

After stepping away from full-time collegiate coaching, he founded One Heartbeat, where he works with teams across the country on leadership, mental toughness, and competitive development. He has worked with more than 1,000 athletic teams nationwide.

Tommy is also a co-founder of The Be Grundy Foundation, a nonprofit focused on resilience and character development.

His goal is simple: provide clarity in a recruiting landscape that often feels confusing.

  ]]> https://coachesinsider.com/mens-basketball/the-new-recruiting-reality-what-todays-college-basketball-landscape-really-looks-like-2/feed/ 0 125789 https://coachesinsider.com/mens-basketball/dont-take-yourself-to-seriously-with-andre-cook-st-edwards-univ-2/ https://coachesinsider.com/mens-basketball/dont-take-yourself-to-seriously-with-andre-cook-st-edwards-univ-2/#respond Thu, 29 Jan 2026 13:00:28 +0000 https://coachesinsider.com/?p=103272 Watch as Coach Andre Cook recommends not to take yourself too seriously but take what you do seriously. He thinks sometimes you need to laugh at yourself, and be able to enjoy the kids. Enjoy what you do and the people you are around. Make coaching not such a stressful situation.

Fred Williams was previously a coach at Auburn University.

By: Greta Jarvis, MS, MPH

Founder of: Center for Active Women

It was around sophomore year of high school when my classmates, teammates, and friends started restricting their eating: the Flat Belly Diet, the Cabbage Soup Diet, MyFitnessPal, and the like. Eventually, this felt normal, expected, and just part of being a disciplined, competitive athlete.

When I returned to my high school over ten years later – this time, as a coach – it's easy to see that, unfortunately, not much has changed. Coaches are still not trained on how to discuss sports nutrition with their teams, and athletes still experience stress around what, when, and how much to eat. With most of my high schoolers on social media, nutrition misinformation and confusion abound.

The conversation around how we can better support our athletes nutritionally is vast (I spent years studying this as a graduate student and have dedicated my career to serving this population!), but understanding one core concept is a valuable first step.

Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (REDs) occurs when someone is not eating enough to meet their body's needs. This impacts a shockingly high number of athletes:

• The International Olympic Committee estimates that 23% to 80% of female athletes and 15% to 70% of male athletes experience REDs, crediting the wide range of statistics to the different ways researchers measure and categorize under-eating (Mountjoy et al., 2023)
• Another team of researchers reviewed the literature to identify 63% of athletes as at risk for REDs (Gallant et al., 2024).

This condition touches every sport, every team, and every school, but most coaches, athletic directors, athletes, and even healthcare practitioners remain unaware of this condition and its devastating impacts on body, mind, and performance (Gallant et al., 2024; Mountjoy et al., 2023). Prevention and education are two of our most powerful tools – and we need all hands on deck.

You don't need advanced nutrition training here. Start by recognizing your role as a leader who helps define the culture and norms in your community. Encourage your athletes to speak kindly about their bodies and to think about food as a valuable teammate rather than an opponent to fear. Remind them that our bodies require a lot of food, every day, to function – especially as an athlete. Our beating hearts and expanding lungs require calories. Adolescent athletes require calories for appropriate development and growth. Even digesting food and regulating body temperature require calories!

Many athletes fear "eating too much," but make sure your athletes are aware of the very real (and very common) risks of not eating enough. The International Olympic Committee outlines the effects of REDs into two categories: health and performance. You can read their full consensus statement for a deeper dive, but here are some signs and symptoms that we commonly see:

Health:

• Compromised bone density (recurring stress fractures are common here!)
• Irregular or absent menstrual cycles
• Gastrointestinal distress
• Urinary incontinence
• Mental health challenges
• Sleep disturbances

Performance:

• Reduced power and endurance
• Reduced motivation and focus
• Reduced coordination and concentration
• Reduced muscle strength

The truth is that no number of "superfoods" can override the negative impacts of under-eating. Not eating enough, whether from intentional restriction or just not understanding how much food our body really needs, holds far too many athletes back from reaching their full potential. When we – as coaches and athletic directors – better understand the signs and symptoms of REDs, we are better positioned to protect our athletes from under-eating and identify when someone may need further support. Our athletes deserve nothing less.

About the Author:

Greta Jarvis, MS, MPH holds her Master of Public Health in Health Promotion and Master of Science in Nutrition, as well as certifications as an Intuitive Eating Counselor and Integrative Health Coach.

As the founder of the Center for Active Women, the heart of Greta's work is supporting women and girls in building peaceful and confident relationships with food, body, and movement. From customized workshops, classes, and lectures to one-on-one coaching and consultation, she equips students, parents, coaches, teachers, athletes, schools, teams, and organizations to navigate and prevent the all-too-common realities of under-eating, disordered eating, body image disturbances, and hormonal imbalances. This work fills a gaping hole causing women and girls lifelong, preventable harm.

Connect with Greta and learn more at Center for Active Women

Citations:

Gallant, T.L., Ong, L.F., Wong, L. et al. Low Energy Availability and Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Sports Med 55, 325–339 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-024-02130-0

Mountjoy, M., Ackerman, K. E., Bailey, D. M., Burke, L. M., Constantini, N., Hackney, A. C., Heikura, I. A., Melin, A., Pensgaard, A. M., Stellingwerff, T., Sundgot-Borgen, J. K., Torstveit, M. K., Jacobsen, A. U., Verhagen, E., Budgett, R., Engebretsen, L., & Erdener, U. (2023). 2023 International Olympic Committee's (IOC) consensus statement on Relative Energy Deficiency in sport (REDs). British Journal of Sports Medicine, 57(17), 1073–1098. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2023-106994

Learn more about Randy here: FoxPoint.Net.

Achieving Excellence by Dr. Colleen M. Hacker with Mallory E. Mann - Book with Online Resource - click here.

This clip comes from our AD Insider | Thursday 30 episode #112. Click here to view full episode.